106) “The so-called “South Pole” is simply an arbitrary point along the Antarctic ice marked with a red and white barbershop pole topped with a metal ball-Earth. This ceremonial South Pole is admittedly and provably NOT the actual South Pole, however, because the actual South Pole could be demonstrably confirmed with the aid of a compass showing North to be 360 degrees around the observer. Since this feat has never been achieved, the model remains pure theory, along with the establishment’s excuse that the geomagnetic poles supposedly constantly move around making verification of their claims impossible.”

Apparently, there is no south pole.

So, here they make the mistake of going for a magnetism argument. The magnetic north pole isn't the true north pole, so why do they expect that from the south pole? 

Additionally, as far as I know nobody has wanted to check for the magnetic south pole in a frozen wasteland. Surprise.

The geomagnetic poles do move around; this isn't an establishment claim (oh no, big government! Mainstream! Noes!) but a scientific one. Yes, it a scientific theory, which means that it has the evidence going for it. I hope that amount of links makes my point? Good.

http://blog.daimonie.com/2015_11_01_archive.html

106 Incomprehension of the model
Nobody claims that there is ONE actual South Pole. That is complete nonsense, nobody says that! There is one geographical south pole, as defined through the earth's shape and it's movement and there is a south magnetic pole, defined though the earth's magnetic field. There is a geophysical relation between the two (explained by the earth's rotation), but they are not the same!

http://200proofsearthisnotflat.blogspot.co.uk/2016/02/debunking-dubay-100-109200.html